Research News

New game of Russian roulette for fire-prone ecosystems

Hot and dry weather after wildfires causes loss of plant diversity.

By CORY NEALON

Published April 21, 2017 This content is archived.

Print

This video created by the research team summarizes the study.

“Fire is a natural process in many ecosystems. But some biodiversity hotspots, like southern Africa, are imperiled due to increasingly common drought-like conditions that limit the ability of plants to regrow after fire. ”
Adam Wilson, assistant professor
Department of Geography

Increasing prolonged periods of severe hot and dry weather during the first summer after wildfires is inhibiting vegetation recovery and causing loss of plant diversity, according to a new international study on climate change.

The importance of fire in sustaining and even enhancing natural systems has long been known, but the cycle of regeneration is being negatively impacted by climate change in some ecosystems, the researchers say.

The findings, published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, are a concern for fire-prone ecosystems around the world, including regions of the United States such as California, along with forest areas of the West and Southeast.

“Fire is a natural process in many ecosystems. But some biodiversity hotspots, like southern Africa, are imperiled due to increasingly common drought-like conditions that limit the ability of plants to regrow after fire,” says Adam Wilson, assistant professor of geography in the UB College of Arts of Sciences and a co-author of the study.

In addition to Wilson, the 44-year study of shrubland vegetation in South Africa — one of the most biologically diverse regions of the world — was led by researchers from three other U.S. institutions and four South African institutions.

The researchers found species diversity declined in the study area, the Cape of Good Hope section of the Table Mountain National Park, because of progressively longer periods of consecutive hot and dry days along with the legacy impact of invasive species. The increase in these extreme weather patterns over the past half-century suggests that opportunities for successful regeneration of vegetation will become increasingly rare.

“Climatic variability may continue to provide years sufficiently benign to allow successful recruitment, but many species in ecosystems that regenerate the first year after a fire event — most species in our study — are subject to a form of climactic Russian roulette,” says Jasper Slingsby of the University of Cape Town, the study’s lead author. “Unfortunately, as climate change intensifies, there are fewer empty chambers in the gun.”

The exacerbation of this post-fire mortality by increasingly severe weather extremes is likely to drive major shifts in the composition and structure of fire-prone ecosystems, according to the researchers.

The study represents one of the few examples of climate-drive diversity loss in natural communities. It demonstrates an important interaction between climate change and disturbance by fire that suggests flammable ecosystems may be particularly sensitive to climate change.

Research was supported by the National Science Foundation, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, and the National Research Foundation of South Africa.

Wilson is funded by NASA to continue researching the impact of climate change on biodiversity in this ecosystem. He will return to South Africa to continue his fieldwork next month.

In addition to Wilson and Slingsby, researchers include Nicky Allsopp of the South African Environmental Observation Network, Cory Merow of Yale University, Matthew Aiello-Lammens of Pace University, Stuart Hall of Stellenbosch University, Hayley Kilroy Mollmann and John A. Silander Jr. of the University of Connecticut, and Ross Turner of the University of KwaZulu-Natal.