Research News

Team heads to Nepal to study seismic performance of buildings

Andreas Stavridis.

Andreas Stavridis is traveling to Nepal to study why certain structures held up and others didn't. Photo: Douglas Levere

By RACHEL STERN

Published June 4, 2015 This content is archived.

Print
“We want to see what that difference is — what made one structure fail and what made one survive. ”
Andreas Stavridis, assistant professor
Department of Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering

After a magnitude 7.8 earthquake hit Nepal in late April, much of the country’s buildings were destroyed.

But there also were several instances where one structure collapsed and another one, right next to it, did not. And that is why Andreas Stavridis, UB assistant professor of civil, structural and environmental engineering, is traveling to Nepal with a team of researchers.

“We want to see what that difference is — what made one structure fail and what made one survive,” he says. “We will collect data and then build models and try to rationalize that, and then explain what worked and what didn’t work and why.”

Stavridis is heading to Nepal today with colleagues from Oregon State University, the Sapienza University of Rome and the University of Porto in Portugal. Also on the trip will be Supratik Bose, a second-year UB PhD student.

Stavridis’ research focuses on masonry structures and about 60 percent of Nepal’s buildings are masonry — made of adobe, bricks or stone, for example. Roughly 25 percent are concrete frames infilled with masonry panels, he says.

“Masonry structures don’t give us much of a warning, they just collapse,” he explains. “Modern structures contain steel reinforcement that prevents such catastrophic collapses and are designed to stay standing, despite damage, so we can evacuate safely. Masonry structures without reinforcement have a very poor behavior when it comes to earthquakes. They just collapse.”

While in Nepal, the team will travel to different buildings and classify each structure as damaged, mildly damaged or not damaged — and what must be done to make these buildings safe. A representative from Nepal’s National Society for Earthquake Technology will lead the group.

Once in Nepal, Stavridis said the team will have a better idea of what types of buildings will be assessed, but hospitals are certainly on the list.

After the trip, the group will return and report on its findings, shedding light on what makes certain buildings fail and what makes others, even ones in close proximity, hold up.

“We hope that our trip brings a better understanding of how actual buildings behave during earthquakes,” Stavridis says. “The more people go to these devastated areas to study the seismic performance of these structures, the better.”